Skip to Content

Why Quantum Computing Isn’t a Serious Risk for Bitcoin Yet

CoinShares research shows current quantum computers are far too weak to endanger Bitcoin, with millions of qubits needed and the real risk pushed to the 2030s or later.
8 February 2026 by
TechStora Editorial Board

Overview

Recent research by digital‑asset investment firm CoinShares indicates that, while quantum computers theoretically threaten Bitcoin’s cryptography, the technology required to mount such attacks is far beyond today’s capabilities.

Current State of Quantum Computing

Existing quantum machines operate with a few hundred qubits at most and are estimated to be 10 to 100,000 times too weak to break Bitcoin’s elliptic‑curve signatures within a practical timeframe.

CoinShares Research Findings

Key points from the note include:

  • Millions of stable qubits would be needed to derive a private key from a public key in hours or days.
  • The realistic threat window is pushed to the 2030s or later.
  • Only about 1.7 million BTC (≈8 % of total supply) reside in legacy P2PK addresses that expose public keys.
  • Even in an extreme scenario, at most ~10,000 BTC could be compromised without causing systemic market disruption.

Potential Vulnerable Bitcoin Addresses

Legacy “pay‑to‑public‑key” (P2PK) addresses reveal the public key on the blockchain, making them theoretically susceptible once a sufficiently powerful quantum computer exists. Modern address types (e.g., P2WPKH, Taproot) keep the public key hidden until the coin is spent, mitigating exposure.

Mitigation Strategies and Future Outlook

CoinShares recommends a gradual, voluntary migration rather than aggressive protocol changes because:

  • Sudden hard forks could introduce software bugs.
  • Forced assumptions about dormant coins risk eroding Bitcoin’s neutrality.
  • Existing upgrade paths (e.g., post‑quantum signature schemes) can be deployed when the threat materialises.

Conclusion

Quantum computing remains a theoretical, long‑term risk for Bitcoin. The network has ample time to adopt post‑quantum cryptography, and investors should weigh this risk against Bitcoin’s fundamental strengths rather than speculative worst‑case scenarios.